Where is the evidence for the existence of the 'novel coronavirus', 'SARS-CoV-2'? – Dr. Kevin P. Corbett
55 FOI responses from 44 institutions around the world indicate ‘no’ isolation/purification/existence of SARS-COV-2 . Last update January 2, 2020.
AMERICAN SCIENTISTS ADMIT “Since we did not perform tests for detecting infectious virus in blood, we avoided the term viraemia and used RNAaemia instead”.
Scientists are detecting novel RNA in multiple patients with influenza or pneumonia-like conditions and ‘assuming’ detection of RNA is equivalent to isolation of the virus. It is not, and one of the groups of scientists was honest enough to admit this: “we did not perform tests for detecting infectious virus in blood” [2].
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download page 39 under ‘Performance Characteristics’ reads, “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA.” The term “quantified” means the CDC has no measurable amount of the virus because it is unavailable. The CDC has no virus.
Andrew Kaufman M.D. demonstrates that covid-19 is really
‘Exosomes’
FOI Request finds no evidence of SARS-CoV-2 [VIDEO]
COVID RNA Base Pairs are Identical to Chromosome 8 Human
DNA
Leading Corona researchers admit that they have no scientific proof for the existence of a virus
https://telegra.ph/Leading-Corona-researchers-admit-that-they-have-no-scientific-proof-for-the-existence-of-a-virus-07-31
National Virus Reference Laboratory (NVRL)
Cases FOR the existence of Covid-19 - are they wrong?
55 FOI responses from 44 institutions around the world indicate ‘no’ isolation/purification/existence of SARS-COV-2 . Last update January 2, 2020.
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/
AMERICAN SCIENTISTS ADMIT “Since we did not perform tests for detecting infectious virus in blood, we avoided the term viraemia and used RNAaemia instead”. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30183-5/fulltext
Scientists are detecting novel RNA in multiple patients with influenza or pneumonia-like conditions and ‘assuming’ detection of RNA is equivalent to isolation of the virus. It is not, and one of the groups of scientists was honest enough to admit this: “we did not perform tests for detecting infectious virus in blood” [2]. https://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download page 39 under ‘Performance Characteristics’ reads,
“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA.” The term “quantified” means the CDC has no measurable amount of the virus because it is unavailable. The CDC has no virus.
Thank you Doreen!